| Irene Molina–de Fuente, Marc Christian Tahita, Kabore Bérenger, Thuy Huong Ta Tang, Luz García, Vicenta González, Agustín Benito, Judith M. Hübschen, Halidou Tinto, Pedro Berzosa Malaria diagnosis challenges and pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions using pregnant women as sentinel population in Nanoro region, Burkina Faso Journal Article In: Pathogens and global health, vol. 118, iss. 6, 2024, ISSN: 2047-7732. @article{nokey,
title = {Malaria diagnosis challenges and pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions using pregnant women as sentinel population in Nanoro region, Burkina Faso},
author = {Irene Molina\textendashde Fuente and Marc Christian Tahita and Kabore B\'{e}renger and Thuy Huong Ta Tang and Luz Garc\'{i}a and Vicenta Gonz\'{a}lez and Agust\'{i}n Benito and Judith M. H\"{u}bschen and Halidou Tinto and Pedro Berzosa},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39140699/},
doi = {10.1080/20477724.2024.2388489},
issn = {2047-7732},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-01-01},
journal = {Pathogens and global health},
volume = {118},
issue = {6},
publisher = {Pathog Glob Health},
abstract = {Malaria in pregnancy causes adverse consequences and prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential for case management. In malaria endemic countries, diagnosis is mainly based on rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and microscopy. However, increasing reports of false negatives caused by low parasitemia and pfhrp2/3 deletions raise concerns about HRP2-based RDT usefulness. This study aimed to assess RDT and microscopy performance and to describe pfhrp2/3 deletions in a cohort of 418 pregnant women in Burkina Faso. Malaria was diagnosed using RDT and microscopy and blood samples were collected during antenatal care visits. Diagnostic results were compared to PCR as gold standard. Pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions were characterized for patients with confirmed P. falciparum infection. RDT had better sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (83%) than microscopy (sensitivity = 57%; specificity = 98%). Low parasitemia (\<150 parasites/µL), especially in multigravidae, was the principal factor causing false negatives by both methods. Moreover, pfhrp2 deletion frequency among overall false negatives by RDT was 21.43%. Higher frequency of deletions was found among all samples, independently of RDT result, for example around 2% of samples had double deletions meaning that the majority of deletions had no effect on RDT testing. Finally, it was found higher pfhrp2 deletion in women with lower uterine height during the first trimester. Wider and National surveillance study of deletions is recommended among pregnant women and in Burkina Faso.},
keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Antigens, Burkina Faso / epidemiology, Diagnostic Tests, doi:10.1080/20477724.2024.2388489, Falciparum* / diagnosis, Falciparum* / epidemiology, Falciparum* / parasitology, Female, Gene Deletion*, Humans, Irene Molina-de la Fuente, Malaria, Marc Christian Tahita, MEDLINE, Microscopy, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine, NCBI, NIH, NLM, Non-U.S. Gov't, Parasitic / diagnosis, Parasitic / epidemiology, Pedro Berzosa, Plasmodium falciparum* / genetics, Plasmodium falciparum* / isolation \& purification, PMC11441055, pmid:39140699, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Protozoan Proteins* / genetics, Protozoan* / genetics, PubMed Abstract, Research Support, Routine* / methods, Sensitivity and Specificity*, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Malaria in pregnancy causes adverse consequences and prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential for case management. In malaria endemic countries, diagnosis is mainly based on rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and microscopy. However, increasing reports of false negatives caused by low parasitemia and pfhrp2/3 deletions raise concerns about HRP2-based RDT usefulness. This study aimed to assess RDT and microscopy performance and to describe pfhrp2/3 deletions in a cohort of 418 pregnant women in Burkina Faso. Malaria was diagnosed using RDT and microscopy and blood samples were collected during antenatal care visits. Diagnostic results were compared to PCR as gold standard. Pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions were characterized for patients with confirmed P. falciparum infection. RDT had better sensitivity (76%) but lower specificity (83%) than microscopy (sensitivity = 57%; specificity = 98%). Low parasitemia (<150 parasites/µL), especially in multigravidae, was the principal factor causing false negatives by both methods. Moreover, pfhrp2 deletion frequency among overall false negatives by RDT was 21.43%. Higher frequency of deletions was found among all samples, independently of RDT result, for example around 2% of samples had double deletions meaning that the majority of deletions had no effect on RDT testing. Finally, it was found higher pfhrp2 deletion in women with lower uterine height during the first trimester. Wider and National surveillance study of deletions is recommended among pregnant women and in Burkina Faso. |
