| Sofia Birgersson, Innocent Valea, Halidou Tinto, Maminata Traore-Coulibaly, Laeticia C Toe, Richard M Hoglund, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden, Stephen A Ward, Umberto D’Alessandro, Angela Abelö, Joel Tarning Population pharmacokinetics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in pregnant and non-pregnant women with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso: an open label trial (Journal Article) In: Wellcome Open Res., vol. 4, pp. 45, 2019, ISSN: 2398-502X. @article{Birgersson2019-ri,
title = {Population pharmacokinetics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in pregnant and non-pregnant women with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso: an open label trial},
author = {Sofia Birgersson and Innocent Valea and Halidou Tinto and Maminata Traore-Coulibaly and Laeticia C Toe and Richard M Hoglund and Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden and Stephen A Ward and Umberto D'Alessandro and Angela Abel\"{o} and Joel Tarning},
doi = {10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14849.2},
issn = {2398-502X},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-03-01},
urldate = {2019-03-01},
journal = {Wellcome Open Res.},
volume = {4},
pages = {45},
publisher = {F1000 Research Ltd},
abstract = {Background: Malaria during pregnancy is a major health risk for
both the mother and the foetus. Pregnancy has been shown to
influence the pharmacokinetics of a number of different
antimalarial drugs. This might lead to an under-exposure in
these patients which could increase the risk of treatment
failure and the development of drug resistance. The study aim
was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of artesunate and
dihydroartemisinin in pregnant and non-pregnant patients using a
population modelling approach. Methods: Twenty-four women in
their second and third trimester of pregnancy and twenty-four
paired non-pregnant women, all with uncomplicated P. falciparum
malaria, were enrolled in this study. Treatment was a fixed-dose
combination of oral artesunate and mefloquine once daily for
three days. Frequent blood samples were collected and
concentration-time data for artesunate and dihydroartemisinin
were analysed simultaneously using nonlinear mixed-effects
modelling. Results: Artesunate pharmacokinetics was best
described by a transit-compartment absorption model followed by
a one-compartment disposition model under the assumption of
complete in vivo conversion of artesunate into
dihydroartemisinin. Dihydroartemisinin pharmacokinetics was best
described by a one-compartment disposition model with
first-order elimination. Pregnant women had a 21% higher
elimination clearance of dihydroartemisinin, compared to
non-pregnant women, resulting in proportionally lower drug
exposure. In addition, initial parasitaemia and liver status
(alanine aminotransferase) were found to affect the relative
bioavailability of artesunate. Conclusions: Results presented
here show a substantially lower drug exposure to the
antimalarial drug dihydroartemisinin during pregnancy after
standard oral treatment of artesunate and mefloquine. This might
result in an increased risk of treatment failure and drug
resistance development, especially in low transmission settings
where relative immunity is lower. Trial registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00701961 (19/06/2008).},
keywords = {Artemisinin-based combination therapy; Artesunate; Dihydroartemisinin; Malaria; Mefloquine; NONMEM; Population pharmacokinetics; Pregnancy},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Malaria during pregnancy is a major health risk for
both the mother and the foetus. Pregnancy has been shown to
influence the pharmacokinetics of a number of different
antimalarial drugs. This might lead to an under-exposure in
these patients which could increase the risk of treatment
failure and the development of drug resistance. The study aim
was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of artesunate and
dihydroartemisinin in pregnant and non-pregnant patients using a
population modelling approach. Methods: Twenty-four women in
their second and third trimester of pregnancy and twenty-four
paired non-pregnant women, all with uncomplicated P. falciparum
malaria, were enrolled in this study. Treatment was a fixed-dose
combination of oral artesunate and mefloquine once daily for
three days. Frequent blood samples were collected and
concentration-time data for artesunate and dihydroartemisinin
were analysed simultaneously using nonlinear mixed-effects
modelling. Results: Artesunate pharmacokinetics was best
described by a transit-compartment absorption model followed by
a one-compartment disposition model under the assumption of
complete in vivo conversion of artesunate into
dihydroartemisinin. Dihydroartemisinin pharmacokinetics was best
described by a one-compartment disposition model with
first-order elimination. Pregnant women had a 21% higher
elimination clearance of dihydroartemisinin, compared to
non-pregnant women, resulting in proportionally lower drug
exposure. In addition, initial parasitaemia and liver status
(alanine aminotransferase) were found to affect the relative
bioavailability of artesunate. Conclusions: Results presented
here show a substantially lower drug exposure to the
antimalarial drug dihydroartemisinin during pregnancy after
standard oral treatment of artesunate and mefloquine. This might
result in an increased risk of treatment failure and drug
resistance development, especially in low transmission settings
where relative immunity is lower. Trial registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00701961 (19/06/2008). |